Although the purpose or idea of an agreement, sometimes not directly prohibited by law, they are always prohibited when it comes to the nature of destroying the purpose of the provision of the law. The authorization of such an object or such consideration is void. If a decree-law provides for a sanction for an act or promise, the execution of such an act or promise would amount to the defeat of that law, because it is implied that the statute intends to prohibit that act. An illegal agreement under the common law of the treaty, is an agreement that the court will not enforce, because the purpose of the agreement is to obtain an illegal purpose. The illegal purpose must result from the performance of the contract. The classic example of such an agreement is a murder contract. However, for an agreement to be declared illegal and non-aeig, because of fraudulent use or consideration, fraud must be unequivocally proven and cannot be based on mere suspicion and presumption. Trade restriction agreements can be implemented if they are appropriate. If an ex-employee is subject to deference, the court will consider geographic boundaries, what the worker knows and the extent of the length of time. Deference to a business seller must be appropriate and binding where there is a true quality-will label. Under common law, price-fixing contracts are legal. Single delivery agreements („Solus“) are legal if reasonable. Contracts contrary to public policy are non-issue.
If the purpose or consideration of an agreement is the execution of an act prohibited by law, the agreement is annulled. Acts or undertakings prohibited by law are punishable by law, as are those prohibited (explicitly or implicitly) by specific legislation of Parliament and state legislators. An agreement whose purpose is to deceive others is null and void. Where the parties agree to defraud a third party and not a contracting party, their agreement is illegal and not bitter. The first two examples of field 6.1 fall into this category. Any agreement involving or involving a violation of persons or other property is considered illegal and therefore not a sidekick. Example 1: A, an owner, rented his house to B, a commercial sex worker, knowing that it would be used for immoral trade. The landlord can`t get the rent back. Here, the object is immoral, the rent payment agreement is invalid. Example 2: A agrees to leave his daughter as concubine to B. The agreement is subject to nullity because it is immoral, although the rental cannot be punishable under the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860). The concept of public order in the broadest sense implies a restriction on the freedom of persons to do something in the best interests or for the good of the Community.
Under india`s Contracts Act, it limits contractual freedom in certain areas that undermine public order. An agreement is a non-endorsement if the law considers it in opposition to public order. However, a contract that requires only legal benefit. B of each game, such as the sale of decks of cards to a known player in which gambling is illegal, is applicable.